Consider listing in awesome-codex-plugins
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Newbie friendliness
- 50/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Review .codex-plugin/plugin.json for the project details to use. If the listing is wanted, read awesome-codex-plugins CONTRIBUTING.md and its README.md format, then prepare the direct README.md change there; done means the repository is listed in the requested format.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
This repo already ships .codex-plugin/plugin.json.
One repo-specific detail I checked first: Full-featured development toolkit with code review, linting, security scanning, and database tools.
If you want it listed, awesome-codex-plugins accepts a direct PR to README.md using the format in CONTRIBUTING.md.
If that list is not useful for this project, feel free to ignore this.
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
danielmiessler/LifeOS#2218 ·
-
docs(agents): strengthen the no-backslash-escaped-backticks rule with an issue-creation example Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
-
technical-debt
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
ll7/robot_sf_ll7#9560 ·
-
package-update
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
oSoWoSo/vOid_Community_repOsitory#148 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100