Example model selection for LLM note writer wildly outdated
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 1/5
- Estimated time
- Under an hour
- Newbie friendliness
- 82/100
Research direction
Open template-api-note-writer/src/note_writer/llm_util.py at line 68 and inspect the example model selection. Update the outdated model reference to grok-4.5, then verify that the surrounding configuration remains consistent and that the note-writer checks or tests still pass.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Seems easy enough to update to grok-4.5
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.9k
- Forks
- 350
- Avg merge
- 11m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from twitter/communitynotes
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
twitter/communitynotes#440 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 10/100
twitter/communitynotes#471 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
twitter/communitynotes#469 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
twitter/communitynotes#460 ·
-
Note on posts written in a region where X is not popular never reaches useful/not useful status Open
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
twitter/communitynotes#459 · 1 reaction ·
All issues in twitter/communitynotes
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100