(Question) SDL frontend removal
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
Research direction
The issue asks why the SDL frontend was removed instead of retaining it as an alternative to X11 behind a feature flag, but names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reading the removal context and the current frontend structure; done would require a maintainer decision and an agreed implementation scope.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Why you removed the SDL frontend instead of left it as a alternative to X11 behind a feature flag?
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 392
- Forks
- 41
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from tsoding/sowon
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 48/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 45/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
level/task module/gcp type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 86/100
hapostgres/pg_auto_failover#1190 ·
-
docs
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
P3 sonic-vpp
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#29662 ·