[Feature Request] Ensure tests exist to confirm custom slot supplier slot info has proper fields
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- testing-qa
Research direction
The issue names no repository files or existing tests; start by reading the linked feature specification and locating the custom slot supplier implementation and related tests. Done means adding tests that confirm the supplier's slot information contains the required fields.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Describe the solution you'd like
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.2k
- Forks
- 241
- Avg merge
- 3d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 49
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from temporalio/sdk-python
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
temporalio/sdk-python#1517 · 10 comments ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
temporalio/sdk-python#496 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
temporalio/sdk-python#1890 ·
-
[Bug] Local activity resolutions regrouped on replay since 1.32.0, delivering the wrong payload Open
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
temporalio/sdk-python#1881 · 1 comment ·
-
bug
temporalio/sdk-python#1817 · 1 comment · 1 assignee ·
All issues in temporalio/sdk-python
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100