Revaluate performance of smacof library
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- performance
Research direction
Start with the linked smacof CRAN package and review how the ndtv repository currently uses it. Establish a reproducible performance comparison and clarify which result would count as sufficient before proposing any change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
when I first tried to use the smacov library, it was fairly slow. but it looks like there has been lots of active development, worth trying again https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/smacof/index.html
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 52
- Forks
- 5
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from statnet/ndtv
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
Adding a legend Open
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 30/100
-
Time as Dates Open
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
Similar issues
-
area: cli area: dogs perf priority: P3
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 95/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
vllm-project/vllm#57936 · 1 comment ·
-
contributor: external needs review
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100