[BUG] Mutation operations with no verification should not display a success message
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
Start by locating the insert mutation operation and the code that displays "The Operation Completed Successfully" when completion status is not checked. Trace the no-verification path and identify the existing behavior for operations that do check status. Done means no success message is displayed for unverified mutations, with the relevant behavior covered by tests if the project has them.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Insert operations that do not check completion status will, by default, display "The Operation Completed Successfully". This is misleading and should be changed.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from stackql/stackql-devel
-
enhancement
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
stackql/stackql-devel#110 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100
stackql/stackql-devel#103 ·
-
stackql/stackql-devel#101 · 1 comment · 1 assignee ·
-
stackql/stackql-devel#100 · 1 assignee ·
-
stackql/stackql-devel#99 · 1 assignee ·
All issues in stackql/stackql-devel
Similar issues
-
area/dev-productivity area/disaster-recovery area/ipcei kind/enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
kind/bug status/0-triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
🤔 refinement needed
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
equinor/radix-operator#1979 ·