Prevent installing/upgrade for a namespace when we detect an installation in another namespace
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- kubernetes, rust
- Domain
- cli, infrastructure
Research direction
Start with the install and upgrade entry points that handle operator_namespace, and review the behavior discussed in pull request 379. Trace how existing operators are detected across namespaces, then verify that installing or upgrading with a different namespace is prevented while same-namespace upgrades remain supported.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
From https://github.com/stackabletech/stackable-cockpit/pull/379
We might want to handle the case of:
- install release 24.11 with operator_namespace = "ns1"
- install/upgrade release 25.3 with operator_namespace = "ns2"
Because:
- The CRDs are cluster scopes, so they would be overwritten, but...
- The operators in the old NS will remain.
I'm fine with us only supporting upgrading in the same namespace (moving namespaces should probably be an uninstall and install). So I guess we'd just need to search for operators in any namespace (labels might be the safest way for detecting).
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 5
- Avg merge
- 4h 41m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from stackabletech/stackablectl
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
stackabletech/stackablectl#456 ·
-
RUSTSEC-2026-0221: `event-listener` allows `!Send` tags to cross thread boundaries via `StackSlot` Open
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
stackabletech/stackablectl#452 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
stackabletech/stackablectl#444 ·
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100
stackabletech/stackablectl#419 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
stackabletech/stackablectl#413 ·
All issues in stackabletech/stackablectl
Similar issues
-
todo:perf
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
ACP agents get no MCP servers when the thread is created before the project's first worktree loads Openstate:needs triage
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
zed-industries/zed#64611 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
ontola/atomic-server#1625 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
objectionary/phie#154 ·