scip-ruby-arm64-linux builds
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- ruby
- Domain
- build-system, ci-cd
Research direction
Start with the scip-ruby CI job and the existing scip-ruby-x86_64-linux release artifact linked in the issue. Add the corresponding Linux arm64 build and release output; done means a scip-ruby-arm64-linux artifact is available for the referenced release workflow.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Problem
Stripe makes contributions to Sorbet and uses the HEAD version of Sorbet internally. Our scip-ruby CI job is set up to pass the exact same flags that we pass to sorbet, into scip-ruby.
When the Sorbet team changes CLI flags and bumps the version of Sorbet used internally, all tests pass, even though scip-ruby doesn't support the extra flags. That's because we only run scip-ruby CI job every 30m, instead on every push.
Then, later I find out that the scip-ruby CI job is failing because of ~"unknown CLI arguments".
So I've been (after the fact) patching the sorbet config in our scip-ruby CI job using something like this:
# Mod the Sorbet config to replace `--uniquely-defined-behavior` with `--stripe-mode`
sed -i 's/--uniquely-defined-behavior/--stripe-mode/' sorbet/config
# Delete the `--extra-package-files-directory-prefix-slash-deprecated` line
sed -i '/--extra-package-files-directory-prefix-slash-deprecated/d' sorbet/config
sed -i '/--extra-package-files-directory-prefix-slash-deprecated/d' sorbet/extra-package-directories.txt
# Delete the line starting with `--packager-layers`
sed -i '/--packager-layers/d' sorbet/config
This is kind of a cat-and-mouse game, so I'd like to make it so that when the Sorbet team bumps the Sorbet version, we run a test specifically checking that the flags are valid with scip-ruby too.
Our CI environment runs arm64 and x86_64 randomly but for Linux we only have x86_64 builds.
So I can't write the test until we have Linux arm64 builds :(
Suggested solution
https://github.com/sourcegraph/scip-ruby/releases/tag/scip-ruby-v0.4.3 currently scip-ruby-x86_64-linux and I would love a scip-ruby-arm64-linux too please
Compared to other tools
No response
OSS Examples
No response
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 22
- Forks
- 4
- Avg merge
- 4h 58m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from sourcegraph/scip-ruby
-
graph/scip-ruby team/graph
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 30/100
sourcegraph/scip-ruby#226 · 1 comment ·
-
graph/scip-ruby team/graph
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
sourcegraph/scip-ruby#219 ·
All issues in sourcegraph/scip-ruby
Similar issues
-
user-reported
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Kong/developer.konghq.com#7316 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
TheOdinProject/curriculum#31408 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
bensheldon/good_job#1816 · 5 comments ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
notch8/utk_knapsack#148 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 78/100
Homebrew/homebrew-cask#288729 · 1 comment ·