[Bug]: Search feature misses important results

Open
#1,314 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale

Research direction

Start with the search feature and review related issues 987, 109, 1364, and 706 for context and prior discussion. Determine which missing APIs, text and code blocks, and API options are in scope, then verify that the affected content is searchable without regressing existing results.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

bug planned site improvement

The search feature has poor performance. Some important APIs (for example, clientOnly and ParentProps) that should appear in the search results are missing.

Also, there have been requests for the ability to search within normal text and code blocks. This functionality would be helpful for users looking to find examples of specific API usage.

Certain API options, such as deferStream, are also not searchable. This can be addressed by using headings to document API options instead of tables. This is being implemented gradually.

Related issues: (for more context and discussions)

Dominant language
MDX
Stars
292
Forks
361
Avg merge
7h 51m
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from solidjs/solid-docs

All issues in solidjs/solid-docs

Similar issues

More Documentation issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.