Ruby::Box support—is it possible in Ruby WASM?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Tech stack
- ruby, wasm
- Domain
- operating-systems
Research direction
Investigate whether Ruby::Box can be supported in Ruby WASM, starting with the existing Ruby WASM port and its platform constraints. Done means establishing whether support is feasible and documenting the required scope or the concrete limitation preventing it.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Is it possible to enable Ruby::Box in Ruby WASM?
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 875
- Forks
- 68
- Avg merge
- 9d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from ruby/ruby.wasm
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
Similar issues
-
SyncEm always forwards a dummy block, so wrapped methods lose their no-block/Enumerator behavior Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
-
bug P2
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
dependabot
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
githubnext/gh-aw-cao#13349 ·
-
user-reported
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Kong/developer.konghq.com#7316 ·