rtk-ai/rtk

rtk may fail with complex Shell commands.

Closed

#1,471 opened on Apr 23, 2026

View on GitHubContributor guide
 (2 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)Rust (2,914 forks)batch import
bugfilter-qualitygood first issue

Repository metrics

Stars
 (48,085 stars)
PR merge metrics
 (Avg merge 11d 1h) (45 merged PRs in 30d)

Description

Ran rtk find . -type f ( -name '.log' -o -name '.env' -o -name '.env.local' -o -name '.DS_Store' -o -name │ '.tmp.langgraph.docker.json' -o -path '/.tmp/' -o -path '/.playwright-cli/' -o -path '/pycache/' -o -path │ '/.pytest_cache/*' ) | sed 's#^./##' | sort | head -n 300 └ rtk: rtk find does not support compound predicates or actions (e.g. -not, -exec). Use find directly.

Contributor guide

Research direction
The issue reports that `rtk find` fails with compound predicates like `\( name '*.log' o name '.env' \)`. Currently, rtk does not support these. To fix, examine how rtk parses the `find` command arguments in its CLI parsing logic (likely in `src/cli.rs` or similar). The fix involves extending the parser to handle grouped predicates and actions. Consider looking at how the `find` command syntax is tokenized and implemented.
Tech stack
rustshell
Domain
clitooling
Issue type
Bug
DifficultyEstimated implementation difficulty for a new contributor, from 1 for very small changes to 5 for expert-level work.
3
Estimated timeA rough time range for an experienced contributor to investigate, implement, test, and prepare a pull request.
Half day
Activity statusHow available the issue appears right now: fresh, active, stale, blocked, or waiting on maintainer input.
Fresh
ClarityHow clearly the issue explains the expected change, acceptance criteria, and next step.
Clear
Prerequisites
basic RustCLI argument parsing
Newbie friendlinessA 1-100 score estimating how approachable this issue is for first-time contributors.
40