caseworkctl explain omits reviewKinds, queues, and accessProfiles
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 68/100
Research direction
Start by locating the implementations and tests for the caseworkctl explain and caseworkctl check commands. Trace how the effective configuration is serialized for source-backed projects, then verify that reviewKinds, ordered stages and outcomes, queues, accessProfiles, and review producers appear in the requested outputs with their ordering preserved.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Problem
caseworkctl explain does not report three parts of casework.yaml that shape what actually happens to a request:
reviewKindsand their orderedstages(queue, deciding profiles, required approvals, initiator and previous-stage exclusions) andoutcomes(settlement, reason required, result required)queueswith their labelsaccessProfiles
caseworkctl check has the same gap on the effective block: for source-backed projects it does not include reviewKinds, nor the review producers that back them.
The result is that the review model, which is the centre of the product since approval ownership moved into Casework, is the part of the configuration the tooling explains least.
Request
- Include
reviewKinds(stages and outcomes, in order),queues, andaccessProfilesincaseworkctl explain --format json. - Include
reviewKindsand their producers in thecaseworkctl checkeffective block for source-backed projects.
Ordering matters and should be preserved: stage order is semantic.
Why it matters
A reader asking "who can decide this, and how many approvals does it take" cannot get that answer out of the tooling today without reading the YAML by hand.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 0
- Avg merge
- 3h 45m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 134
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from registrystack/registry-stack
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
registrystack/registry-stack#1239 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
registrystack/registry-stack#1235 ·
-
area:breg bug good first issue rust
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
registrystack/registry-stack#1227 ·
-
area:casework documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
registrystack/registry-stack#1217 ·
-
area:breg documentation
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
registrystack/registry-stack#1213 ·
All issues in registrystack/registry-stack
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
Eynzof/Hermes-CN-Desktop#610 ·
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
gitbutlerapp/gitbutler#15998 · 1 comment ·
-
bug triage:deciding
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 88/100
open-telemetry/otel-arrow#4132 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100