radius-project/resource-types-contrib

Add Redis Resource Type and Kubernetes Redis Recipe - Bicep

Closed

#7 opened on Aug 11, 2025

View on GitHub
 (0 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)Bicep (20 forks)auto 404
good first issuetriaged

Repository metrics

Stars
 (7 stars)
PR merge metrics
 (Avg merge 8d 5h) (16 merged PRs in 30d)

Description

Overview of the Resource type and Recipe

Create a Radius resource type schema and a Kubernetes Recipe in Bicep for provisioning Redis.

Acceptance criteria

  1. A resource type schema (if not available) that defines all the needed properties for Redis
  2. An associated Kubernetes Recipe that provisions the Redis container
  3. README for Resource type and Recipe
  4. Manual Testing that the resource type works with an application

Refer to the contribution guide for the repo structure, naming conventions and other contribution requirements

Additional context

Reference to in-built redis resource type - https://docs.radapp.io/reference/resource-schema/cache/redis/ Reference for Kubernetes Recipe - https://github.com/radius-project/recipes/blob/main/local-dev/rediscaches.bicep

Would you like to support us?

  • Yes, I would like to support you

AB#16726

Contributor guide

Research direction
Review the in built Redis resource type documentation and the existing Kubernetes recipe for Redis caches. Then follow the contribution guide to create the schema and recipe files.
Tech stack
kubernetesredis
Domain
backenddatabase
Issue type
Feature
DifficultyEstimated implementation difficulty for a new contributor, from 1 for very small changes to 5 for expert-level work.
2
Estimated timeA rough time range for an experienced contributor to investigate, implement, test, and prepare a pull request.
Half day
Activity statusHow available the issue appears right now: fresh, active, stale, blocked, or waiting on maintainer input.
Fresh
ClarityHow clearly the issue explains the expected change, acceptance criteria, and next step.
Clear
Prerequisites
GitKubernetes
Newbie friendlinessA 1-100 score estimating how approachable this issue is for first-time contributors.
75