racket/typed-racket

`require/typed/provide` and `unsafe-require/typed/provide` do not support all forms `require/typed` does like doc suggests

Open

#805 opened on Feb 23, 2019

View on GitHub
 (0 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)Racket (106 forks)github user discovery
good first issue

Repository metrics

Stars
 (576 stars)
PR merge metrics
 (Avg merge 11d 14h) (1 merged PR in 30d)

Description

What version of Racket are you using?

7.2

What program did you run?

#lang typed/racket/base

(require/typed/provide racket/base
  [(add1 inc) (Integer -> Integer)])

What should have happened?

Program compiles, as doc for require/typed/provide suggests:

(require/typed/provide m rt-clause ...)

I don't know if this is a bug or it is intended and the doc is just imprecise.

If you got an error message, please include it here.

; require/typed/provide: expected identifier or expected one of these literals: #:struct or #:opaque
;   at: (add1 inc)
;   in: (require/typed/provide racket/base ((add1 inc) (Integer -> Integer)))

Contributor guide

Research direction
Investigate the implementation of `require/typed/provide` and compare it with `require/typed` to identify which forms are missing. Focus on handling renaming clauses like `(original id renamed id)`. Then implement support for those missing forms accordingly.
Tech stack
None
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Bug
DifficultyEstimated implementation difficulty for a new contributor, from 1 for very small changes to 5 for expert-level work.
3
Estimated timeA rough time range for an experienced contributor to investigate, implement, test, and prepare a pull request.
Half day
Activity statusHow available the issue appears right now: fresh, active, stale, blocked, or waiting on maintainer input.
Active
ClarityHow clearly the issue explains the expected change, acceptance criteria, and next step.
Clear
Prerequisites
RacketTyped Racket
Newbie friendlinessA 1-100 score estimating how approachable this issue is for first-time contributors.
65