Respect `vacation.dcf`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100
Research direction
The issue names only the upcoming vacation.dcf format and its From, To, and Reason entries; no repository file, test, or entry point is identified. Start by reading the referenced format and locating the relevant devtools behavior. Done criteria must be established for handling zero or more entries before implementation can begin.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Coming soon: https://cran.r-project.org/vacation.dcf
with zero or more entries of the form
From:
To:
Reason:
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 762
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from r-lib/devtools
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
`dev_sitrep()` says to update with `pak::pak("somePackage")` but doing so doesn't change the report Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 25/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
Similar issues
-
documentation pkg infrastructure
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
epiverse-trace/epiparameter#511 ·
-
function:write_dwc
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Urgent request: Due to vulnerabilities move to API version 12.6.1 (12.6.2 eventually) or 13.1.1 Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
jbkunst/highcharter#849 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
r-lib/pkgdepends#485 · 3 comments ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100