pytorch/examples

Doc comment on `accuracy` method in imagenet example, incorrect?

Open

#312 opened on Feb 27, 2018

View on GitHub
 (1 comment) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)Python (21,634 stars) (9,429 forks)batch import
good first issue

Description

I'm confused with the doc comment for the accuracy function in the imagenet example:

def accuracy(output, target, topk=(1,)):
    """Computes the precision@k for the specified values of k"""
    maxk = max(topk)
    batch_size = target.size(0)

    _, pred = output.topk(maxk, 1, True, True)
    pred = pred.t()
    correct = pred.eq(target.view(1, -1).expand_as(pred))

    res = []
    for k in topk:
        correct_k = correct[:k].view(-1).float().sum(0, keepdim=True)
        res.append(correct_k.mul_(100.0 / batch_size))
return res

https://github.com/pytorch/examples/blob/master/imagenet/main.py#L298-L299

This seems like it computes accuracy and not precision as false positives are not accounted for. Should the doc comment read "Computes the accuracy@k for the specified values of k" or is my understanding of precision for object detection incorrect?

Many thanks for pytorch, it's a great library!

Contributor guide

Doc comment on `accuracy` method in imagenet example, incorrect? · pytorch/examples#312 | Good First Issue