Enhancement for README.md
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
The issue only mentions README.md and does not identify a section, problem, or requested change. Review the current README.md first, then clarify the desired scope and acceptance criteria before editing; the issue does not define what done looks like.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
To follow enhancements. Feedbacks on our current README.md file are welcome.
Thank you!
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 5
- Forks
- 4
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from pythonph/osspyasia
-
Difficulty 1/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 63/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
All issues in pythonph/osspyasia
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
agilepathway/label-checker#640 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 75/100
BasedHardware/omi#15662 · 1 comment ·
-
documentation help wanted
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 90/100
-
documentation good first issue
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
amponce/archive-movie-browser#167 ·
-
user-reported
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
Kong/developer.konghq.com#7316 ·