python/typeshed

Work on merging annotations from types-pika (a non-typeshed project) into typeshed's pika stubs

Open

#9246 opened on Nov 22, 2022

View on GitHub
 (12 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)Python (3,436 stars) (1,483 forks)batch import
help wanted

Description

See for example https://github.com/typeshed-internal/stub_uploader/actions/runs/3521987995/jobs/5904439698

PyPI: https://pypi.org/project/types-pika/ Ref https://github.com/python/typeshed/pull/9200

cc @srittau @JelleZijlstra @qubidt

Contributor guide

Tech stack
python
Domain
developer experiencetooling
Issue type
feature
DifficultyEstimated implementation difficulty for a new contributor, from 1 for very small changes to 5 for expert-level work.
3
Estimated timeA rough time range for an experienced contributor to investigate, implement, test, and prepare a pull request.
half day
Activity statusHow available the issue appears right now: fresh, active, stale, blocked, or waiting on maintainer input.
stale
ClarityHow clearly the issue explains the expected change, acceptance criteria, and next step.
needs investigation
Prerequisites
Python type stubstypeshed contribution guidepika library
Newbie friendlinessA 1-100 score estimating how approachable this issue is for first-time contributors.
30
Research direction
Examine the types pika stubs from PyPI and compare them to the current pika stubs in typeshed. Review the linked PR #9200 and the stub uploader CI run for context. Identify missing type annotations and plan a merge strategy. Consider reaching out to @srittau @JelleZijlstra @qubidt for guidance on the preferred approach.