Add Vulnerability Exchange (VEX) statements for CPython SBOMs to reference
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
Research direction
Start by reading the related CPython issue 112302 and compare the proposed OpenVEX and CycloneDX formats. Define how VEX documents would reference CPython SBOM dependencies, be hosted at an HTTPS location, and be updated through GitHub pull requests; completion requires a documented format and contribution workflow.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Part of https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/112302
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
CPython and its artifacts contain many dependencies which can have vulnerabilities. In the interest of not causing mass-confusion from SBOM consumers about the status of the vulnerabilities in dependencies (especially when those vulnerabilities aren't exploitable, like is usually the case for CPython's usage of OpenSSL) it is useful to provide a systematic and automatic mechanism to quell SBOM consumers questions on a potentially vulnerable component.
Describe the solution you'd like
- VEX document(s) which are capable of referencing dependencies inside of CPython SBOMs and making determinations about affectedness of vulnerabilities.
- Need to evaluate VEX formats (OpenVEX and CycloneDX are my current candidates)
- Referenceable location (via HTTPS) so that CPython SBOMs can reference the document(s)
- Easy way to update the VEX documents via GitHub PR process. Should be easy to contribute so core developers can do so when needed.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 1.7k
- Forks
- 700
- Avg merge
- 1d 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 14
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from python/pythondotorg
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
python/pythondotorg#3137 · 2 comments ·
-
app/pages bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
python/pythondotorg#2677 · 3 comments ·
-
backend easy
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
python/pythondotorg#2453 · 8 comments ·
-
bug good-first-issue
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 30/100
python/pythondotorg#3125 · 1 comment ·
-
bug
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 74/100
python/pythondotorg#3094 · 5 comments ·
All issues in python/pythondotorg
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#172 ·
-
A cancelled tests run makes the coverage comment workflow fail and reports it as a red check on main Openarea: ci bug perceived difficulty: 3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Nitjsefnie-Harness-Commons/daedalus#921 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness#4207 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
ClickHouse/clickhouse-connect#1057 ·