rust-lang/rust-clippy

suspicious-operation-groupings false positive

Open

#6.722 aberto em 11 de fev. de 2021

Ver no GitHub
 (12 comments) (1 reaction) (1 assignee)Rust (1.391 forks)batch import
C-bugI-false-positivegood first issue

Métricas do repositório

Stars
 (10.406 stars)
Métricas de merge de PR
 (Mesclagem média 19d 22h) (113 fundiu PRs em 30d)

Description

Lint name: suspicious-operation-groupings

I tried this code:

pub fn truncated_cone_volume([r0, r1]: [f32; 2], height: f32) -> f32 {
    use std::f32::consts::PI;
    PI * height * (r0 * r0 + r0 * r1 + r1 * r1) / 3.0
}

Latest clippy gives me this:

warning: This sequence of operators looks suspiciously like a bug.
 --> src/lib.rs:3:40
  |
3 |     PI * height * (r0 * r0 + r0 * r1 + r1 * r1) / 3.0
  |                                        ^^^^^^^ help: I think you meant: `PI * r1`
  |
  = note: `#[warn(clippy::suspicious_operation_groupings)]` on by default
  = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#suspicious_operation_groupings

(playground link: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=4dbce29a2cf5bed0efc48214538bea53)


Minimal reproduce:

pub fn false_positive(r0: f32, r1: f32) -> f32 {
    r0 * r0 + r0 * r1 + r1 * r1
}
2 |     r0 * r0 + r0 * r1 + r1 * r1
  |                         ^^^^^^^ help: I think you meant: `r0 * r1`

I don't know how this lint is implemented, but maybe it should only trigger if the number of variables involved is the same as the number of binary expressions?

For instance, this is a true positive:

pub fn true_positive(r0: f32, r1: f32, r2: f32) -> f32 {
    r0 * r0 + r1 * r1 + r2 * r1
}

…although the suggestion is probably not the best:

2 |     r0 * r0 + r1 * r1 + r2 * r1
  |               ^^^^^^^ help: I think you meant: `r0 * r1`

Guia do colaborador