Opposite of increment-decrement (for non-loop-counter usage)

(1 comentário) (0 reação) (0 responsável)Go (316 forks)github user discovery

good first issuerule proposal

Métricas do repositório

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The increment-decrement rule is quite opinionated, as many rules are. However, its suggestion is problematic in the sense that e.g.

it's not that common of a practice in my experience to use ++/-- in contexts other than loop counters in Go code, e.g. stdlib
many programming languages don't even have those operators (for example Python, Rust, Swift, Zig)

Describe the solution you'd like

increment-decrement can be disabled like all others, no problem with that, and that does not require a solution.

But for the above reasons, a rule that would do the opposite of increment-decrement for anything but loop counters would be nice to have.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Just disabling increment-decrement, but that won't help with adoption of the += 1 style.

Additional context

N/A.

Direção de pesquisa: Estude a implementação da regra increment decrement existente no revive (provavelmente em rules/increment decrement.go) para entender o padrão de adição de uma nova regra. Em seguida, projete uma nova regra que sinalize o uso de `i += 1` para variáveis que não são contadores de loop e sugira `i++` (ou o oposto).
Pilha de tecnologia: go
Domain: backendtooling
Tipo Issue: Funcionalidade
Difficulty: 3
Tempo estimado: 3-5 dias
Status da atividade: Ativo
Clarity: Claro
Prerequisites: Go
Simpatia para novatos: 65