[Clang] Explain satisfaction failure for more type traits
#141.911 aberto em 29 de mai. de 2025
Métricas do repositório
- Stars
- (26.378 stars)
- Métricas de merge de PR
- (Mesclagem média 1d 2h) (1.000 fundiu PRs em 30d)
Description
Last week, we added the scaffolding for clang to explain why a standard type trait is not satisfied - when used either in a static_assert or as atomic constraint, in Sema::DiagnoseTypeTraitDetails (#141238)
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/xb7PcxzTx
So far, this has only been done for std::is_trivially_relocatable.
There are plenty of type traits that could benefit from additional diagnostics https://eel.is/c++draft/type.traits#meta.type.synop
I figure adding support for more type traits (one at a time!) could be a good first issue, and it's always nice to improve our diagnostics.