llvm/llvm-project

[Clang] Explain satisfaction failure for more type traits

Open

#141.911 aberto em 29 de mai. de 2025

Ver no GitHub
 (20 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)C++ (10.782 forks)batch import
clang:diagnosticsclang:frontendgood first issue

Métricas do repositório

Stars
 (26.378 stars)
Métricas de merge de PR
 (Mesclagem média 1d 2h) (1.000 fundiu PRs em 30d)

Description

Last week, we added the scaffolding for clang to explain why a standard type trait is not satisfied - when used either in a static_assert or as atomic constraint, in Sema::DiagnoseTypeTraitDetails (#141238)

https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/xb7PcxzTx

So far, this has only been done for std::is_trivially_relocatable.

There are plenty of type traits that could benefit from additional diagnostics https://eel.is/c++draft/type.traits#meta.type.synop

I figure adding support for more type traits (one at a time!) could be a good first issue, and it's always nice to improve our diagnostics.

Guia do colaborador