dotnet/runtime

High Contention in MemoryCache _cacheSize Updates Causing Performance Degradation

Open

#111.959 aberto em 29 de jan. de 2025

Ver no GitHub
 (5 comments) (5 reactions) (0 assignees)C# (5.445 forks)batch import
area-Extensions-Cachinghelp wantedtenet-performance

Métricas do repositório

Stars
 (17.886 stars)
Métricas de merge de PR
 (Mesclagem média 12d 11h) (661 fundiu PRs em 30d)

Description

Description

The current implementation of MemoryCache updates _cacheSize using Interlocked.CompareExchange in a retry loop (up to 100 times). This creates high contention when multiple threads attempt to modify _cacheSize, leading to increased CPU usage and reduced throughput under high concurrency.

using System;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Caching.Memory;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Options;

var cache = new MemoryCache(Options.Create(new MemoryCacheOptions { SizeLimit = 1000 }));

Parallel.For(0, 100, i =>
{
    cache.Set(i, i, new MemoryCacheEntryOptions { Size = 10 });
});

Console.WriteLine($"Cache Count: {cache.Count}"); 

Issue: When running with a high number of concurrent threads, CPU usage spikes and cache performance degrades due to frequent retries in UpdateCacheSizeExceedsCapacity.

Configuration

.NET Version: .NET 9 OS: Windows 11 Architecture: x64 Machine Specs: 16-core CPU, 16GB RAM

Regression?

Not a regression but a long-standing inefficiency in MemoryCache.

Data

Analysis

Problem:

  • Interlocked.CompareExchange retried up to 100 times under contention.

  • Causes CPU spikes when multiple threads modify _cacheSize.

  • Locks too frequently, slowing down high-throughput applications.

Proposed Fix: ✅ Use ConcurrentQueue<long> for batch updates instead of per-entry updates. ✅ Process updates asynchronously in a background task, reducing lock contention. ✅ Minimize atomic operations on _cacheSize, improving cache scalability.

Guia do colaborador