Report evolving arrays / evolving variables differently in QuickInfo
#54.414 aberto em 26 de mai. de 2023
Métricas do repositório
- Stars
- (48.455 stars)
- Métricas de merge de PR
- (Mesclagem média 6d 17h) (9 fundiu PRs em 30d)
Description
Suggestion
🔍 Search Terms
evolving array any quickinfo tooltip
✅ Viability Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
⭐ Suggestion
When hovering over an evolving array, we should show the type as something special so that people don't think it's actually any and get mad/confused about it
Proposed Instead of
const arr = [];
arr
// ?^ any[]
show
const arr = [];
arr
// ?^ (evolving array)
Same for
let a;
📃 Motivating Example
We have many reports both external and internal of people thinking that an evolving array is of type any. This also appears as bug reports where people think that noImplicitAny has a bug in it because it's not reporting one
Recently https://twitter.com/mattpocockuk/status/1662103198910300161
#43752 #45369
💻 Use Cases
Prevent confusion