`session attach` is confusing, should probably be called `status`

Open
#80 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Newbie friendliness
48/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
rust
Domain
cli

Research direction

Start at the CLI entry point for the session attach command and compare its behavior with job attachment. Decide whether status should replace attach or be an alias, then make the chosen name the default session sub-command. Verify the resulting command names and help text.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

We don't really "attach" to sessions in the same way we do to jobs, so the command name is somewhat confusing. Consider renaming or at least giving attach an alias status, and advertise that as the default session sub-command.

Dominant language
Rust
Stars
3
Forks
0
Avg merge
9d 12h
Merged PRs (30d)
11

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from oxidecomputer/sush

All issues in oxidecomputer/sush

Similar issues

More Rust issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.