nteract/papermill

Still wrong URL for some Binder examples in docs

Open

#563 opened on Dec 25, 2020

View on GitHub
 (0 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)Python (402 forks)batch import
help wantednew-contributor-friendly

Repository metrics

Stars
 (5,381 stars)
PR merge metrics
 (No merged PRs in 30d)

Description

This is a conscious duplicate of the Binder part of #542 , which has been closed after the master/ main part seemed to have been addressed.

So there are still several places in the codebase (including usage-workflow.rst that was discussed in #542 ) that refer to process_highlight_dates.ipynb when sending users to Binder, where they will get a 404 because that notebook does not exist any more.

Contributor guide

Research direction
Update the Binder example URLs in documentation files to point to existing notebooks, specifically replacing references to process highlight dates.ipynb with a valid notebook.
Tech stack
python
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
DifficultyEstimated implementation difficulty for a new contributor, from 1 for very small changes to 5 for expert-level work.
1
Estimated timeA rough time range for an experienced contributor to investigate, implement, test, and prepare a pull request.
Under 1 hour
Activity statusHow available the issue appears right now: fresh, active, stale, blocked, or waiting on maintainer input.
Active
ClarityHow clearly the issue explains the expected change, acceptance criteria, and next step.
Clear
Prerequisites
None
Newbie friendlinessA 1-100 score estimating how approachable this issue is for first-time contributors.
95