[feature] Shell completion
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100
Research direction
Start by reviewing the referenced shtab documentation and its alternatives to understand possible completion approaches. Then inspect gyp-next's command-line entry points and determine which common shells and commands are in scope; done means the supported shells have working, documented completions.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Can it provide completions for common shells? I guess https://docs.iterative.ai/shtab/ or https://docs.iterative.ai/shtab/#alternatives can be useful. TIA!
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 155
- Forks
- 101
- Avg merge
- 6d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from nodejs/gyp-next
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 86/100
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 45/100
-
github_actions question
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
-
[typo] miss < Open
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 45/100
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100