Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

Support the `If-None-Match` header

Open
#1,431 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
38/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
javascript
Domain
api, backend

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by locating the server's POST and PUT request handling and its conditional-header processing, then review the existing behavior around If-None-Match. Done means the requested 412/no-overwrite behavior is covered, with the POST/Slug and write-only access questions resolved.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Expected behaviour

  • POST a resource to an IRI where a resource already exists, with the If-None-Match header set.
  • The server returns 412, and the original resource is unchanged.

Actual behaviour

  • POST a resource to an IRI where a resource already exists, with the If-None-Match header set.
  • The server returns 201 Created, and the original resource is overwritten.

Additional context

When receiving a resource creation request (i.e. POST or PUT, possibly PATCH?), if the If-None-Match header is set, the server should perform a check to ensure that no resource is already stored at the target IRI.

In the case of POST, since the Slug header is meant to be a hint and not a hard constraint, I'm not sure what the behaviour should be, but when PUTting a resource to an IRI where a resource already exists, an If-None-Match request should fail with 412.

Open question

When only having write (but not read) access to a container, can this be used to exfiltrate information one should not be allowed to access ?

Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
1.8k
Forks
308
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from nodeSolidServer/node-solid-server

All issues in nodeSolidServer/node-solid-server

Similar issues

More JavaScript issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.