IPFS addrs should use multihashes, not CIDs.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- networking
Research direction
Start by locating the IPFS multiaddr parsing and formatting entry points in the Java implementation; the issue names the QmId, base58-encoded multihash, and peer public-key hash. Read the surrounding address representation and tests, if present, to determine where CID handling is assumed. Done means IPFS addrs use the described multihash representation rather than CIDs.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
The QmId part is actually just a bare base58 encoded multihash (for now). It's a direct hash of the peer's public key.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 20
- Forks
- 19
- Avg merge
- 13h 10m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Similar issues
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
-
Two open-case totals on one screen: the Programs tile says 15,858 and the nav badge says 15,868 Openbug frontend maui-pilot
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
objectionary/eo-graphs#74 ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100