Security review

Open

#18 opened on Mar 6, 2019 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty: 5/5
Estimated time: Over a week
Newbie friendliness: 15/100

Issue type: Feature
Clarity: Needs clarification
Activity status: Stale
Tech stack: rust
Domain: security

Research direction

The issue identifies no files, tests, or entry points. Start by defining the security review scope for rust-ece and its acceptance criteria; the work is done when the review outcome and any required follow-up are documented.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

This is just a tracking issue.

Dominant language: Rust
Stars: 29
Forks: 14
Avg merge: 3h 15m
Merged PRs (30d): 2

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Similar issues

exposition.rs still carries its own DogSource label match Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100

shep-pm/shep#599 · Opened Sep 22, 2026
IntegrationStore's ?workspace search param has no reader since the plugin removal Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100

ontola/atomic-server#1625 · Opened Sep 22, 2026
python: expose YARA-X version number Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100

VirusTotal/yara-x#777 · Opened Sep 22, 2026
has_tail_capacity wraps and get_writable_raw_unchecked commits raw_len before the bounds check Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 82/100

stratum-mining/stratum#2404 · Opened Sep 22, 2026
Report invalid UTF-8 case manifests through CaseManifestError Open

bug ci good first issue

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100

wavefnd/Wave#688 · Opened Sep 22, 2026

More Rust issues