how to collect code coverage from remote computer

Open

#132 opened on Aug 30, 2024 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty: 5/5
Estimated time: Over a week
Newbie friendliness: 25/100

Issue type: Feature
Clarity: Needs clarification
Activity status: Stale
Tech stack: csharp
Domain: testing-qa

Research direction

Start by reviewing the repository's code coverage documentation and samples for any guidance on remote collection or multi-VM test environments. Clarify the supported environments, collection workflow, and acceptance criteria for Azure App Services testing across multiple VMs before implementation can be scoped.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

is there possibility to collect code coverage from remote computer? I'm part of azure web apps team (app services) and we need to collect code coverage when running test on our testing environments which consists of multiple VMs

Dominant language: C#
Stars: 125
Forks: 17
Avg merge: 1h 17m
Merged PRs (30d): 2

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from microsoft/codecoverage

dotnet-coverage collect --server-mode leaks coverage across tests when using snapshot -r Open

Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 52/100

microsoft/codecoverage#246 · 6 comments · Opened Sep 15, 2026
Forward SIGTERM to child process Open

Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 55/100

microsoft/codecoverage#237 · 1 comment · Opened Aug 10, 2026
Add support for merging coverage results from multiple test assemblies Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 35/100

microsoft/codecoverage#234 · 1 comment · 2 reactions · Opened Jul 29, 2026
Add an option to print a code coverage summary to standard output Open

Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 52/100

microsoft/codecoverage#233 · 2 reactions · Opened Jul 29, 2026
Instrumented probe stores through an unguarded raw pointer into a file-backed mapping — any loss of page backing kills the process with an AccessViolation attributed to innocent user code Open

Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 28/100

microsoft/codecoverage#232 · 6 comments · Opened Jul 25, 2026

All issues in microsoft/codecoverage

Similar issues

CS0162 "Unreachable code detected" warning from a MSBuildTemp .tmp file in every game project Open

bug

Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 90/100

stride3d/stride#3477 · Opened Sep 23, 2026
docs: update contribution guidelines to account for AI-generated contributions Open

Type: enhancement

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100

apache/arrow-adbc#4809 · Opened Sep 23, 2026
[quality-improver] CiRunSummaryAggregateReader.ValidateModule provenance cross-check guards are untested on the throwing path Open

type/automation type/tech-debt

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100

microsoft/testfx#11477 · Opened Sep 23, 2026
.NET 11 isolated: feed entries using the new `Azure.Functions.Sdk` MSBuild SDK are misdetected as in-process, so no templates are found Open

Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100

microsoft/vscode-azurefunctions#5197 · 1 comment · Opened Sep 23, 2026
reactor-build-and-check says mur is 'selfhost only', but mur.exe ships in the same skill-kit zip as that skill Open

Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100

microsoft/microsoft-ui-reactor#1274 · Opened Sep 23, 2026

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.