[Question] Normal map: v3 vs v2

Open
#163 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
20/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Active
Domain
computer-vision, machine-learning

Research direction

No files, tests, or entry points are identified in the issue. First clarify whether the request concerns documentation of the two models or release of moge-3-vitl-normal weights; the work is complete only when that request has a defined project response or implementation scope.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Thank you for this great work. After trying it out, I found that

  • the normal mapping of $\textcolor{red}{\text{moge-3-vitl is not as good as that of moge-2-vitl-normal}}$.
  • Is this because $\textcolor{green}{\text{moge-2-vitl-normal is specifically trained on the normal mapping?}}$

If so, do you have plans to open up the weights of moge-3-vitl-normal?

Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
3k
Forks
234
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from microsoft/MoGe

All issues in microsoft/MoGe

Similar issues

More JavaScript issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.