Unable to save service discovery during bonding makes it impossible to get data from some bonded devices on reconnect
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- embedded-iot
Research direction
Start by reading aioble's service discovery and subscription flow, including ClientService, ClientCharacteristic, and ClientDescriptor, to understand how handles and UUIDs are currently managed. Determine whether bonded reconnects can reuse saved attributes and subscribe before discovery; done would mean supported devices can receive notifications or indications without repeating slow discovery.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
A BLE peripheral that bonds also assumes that the services and characteristics and descriptors discovered during the bonding connection are saved by the client such that on a reconnect, after encryption, service discovery is unnecessary and the peripheral can notify and/or indicate it's data. There are several health devices that do this.
With the aioble library, one is forced to do service discovery every connection in order to subscribe to notifications/indications. However, service discovery is painfully slow, and long before it is done the health device has already indicated/notified its data and by the time one has subscribed (if the device does not disconnect) the data has already been evented and nothing is received.
How to work around this?
Is this a possible work-a-round?
Edit the code so that the start, end, and value handles are made public instead of private
Save these handles and UUID for each service, characteristic, and descriptor discovered
Recreate the ClientService, ClientCharacteristic, and ClientDescriptor for each of the saved items (of interest)
Change the subscribe method such that it uses the saved ClientDescriptor instead of doing further discovery operations to get the Descriptor.
I do not know if that is possible as the devil is always in the details. But to those who are familiar with the inner workings of aioble, is this something one could do, or is it far more complicated that that?
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2.9k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Avg merge
- 7d 6h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from micropython/micropython-lib
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
micropython/micropython-lib#1074 ·
-
needs-info
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100
micropython/micropython-lib#943 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
micropython/micropython-lib#931 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 62/100
micropython/micropython-lib#795 · 2 comments ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
micropython/micropython-lib#762 ·
All issues in micropython/micropython-lib
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
syfoud/Simulated_Scepter#172 ·
-
A cancelled tests run makes the coverage comment workflow fail and reports it as a red check on main Openarea: ci bug perceived difficulty: 3
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
Nitjsefnie-Harness-Commons/daedalus#921 · 1 comment ·
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness#4207 ·
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 92/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
ClickHouse/clickhouse-connect#1057 ·