Align CLOMonitor coverage with delivered repository inventory
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Active
- Domain
- tooling
Research direction
Start by reviewing policy issue #16, SUBPROJECTS.md, the global replication groups, and the current CLOMonitor configuration. Compare the four omitted repositories with the existing coverage policy; this issue is done when a maintainer decision is recorded, including any exclusions, so a separate cncf/clomonitor PR can be opened.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Context
An audit has been conducted and confirmed that SUBPROJECTS.md and the global replication groups now cover all 45 public Microcks repositories consistently.
However, the CNCF CLOMonitor configuration currently covers 20 repositories: 19 delivered components with community + code checks and microcks.io with docs. The current report remains healthy at A / 98.49%.
Four repositories classified as delivered components are missing:
microcks-mcp-servermicrocks-agent-skillsapi-toolinghomebrew-tap
There is no existing CLOMonitor issue or pull request covering them.
Decision needed
The existing policy from #16 assigns community + code to delivered components. CLOMonitor also offers code-lite, recommended for secondary code repositories.
@lbroudoux @SebastienDegodez, should we:
- Add all four repositories with
community + codefor consistency with the existing policy; - Use
community + code-litefor selected secondary tooling repositories; or - Intentionally exclude any of them, documenting why CLOMonitor coverage is not relevant?
Once agreed, we can submit a separate PR to cncf/clomonitor. No upstream PR should be opened before this decision.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 41
- Avg merge
- 1d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from microcks/.github
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 50/100
-
github_actions
All issues in microcks/.github
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
use-agent-os/agent-os#3314 ·
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 85/100
githubnext/rig#534 ·
-
documentation low-priority templates
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 85/100
jesseray718/openroot#87 ·
-
factory-active factory-automatic task-bug-reproduction-cannot-reproduce task-identify-harness-labels-done task-identify-issue-type-done
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
ReedClanton/NixOS#41 ·