A more user-friendly API

Open
#84 6 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
javascript
Domain
backend

Research direction

Start by reviewing the library's current encode and decode entry points and how they relate to JSON.parse and JSON.stringify. Define the public API and schema behavior needed for one-step calls, including preservation of object values and deep equality between the encoded input and decoded output.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

question

Is anyone here opposed to maybe adding a more user-friendly API to this library.

Right now it takes a fair amount of boilerplate to do what is essentially JSON.parse(encoded) or JSON.stringify(obj).

Plus, there doesn't seem to be a way to get the same objects out on the decode end as were put into the encoding step. This means even more boilerplate code to translate certain fields from numbers into enum strings. Considering this is probably the most common use case it seems worth it to make this a simple one-step call like buffer = encode(schema, obj) and obj = decode(schema, buffer). And preferably, the input to encode and the output of decode should have deep equality.

Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
881
Forks
113
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from mapbox/pbf

All issues in mapbox/pbf

Similar issues

More JavaScript issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.