scala/scala3

Match type syntax does not allow writing type patterns for type members directly

Open

#13,416 opened on 2021年8月29日

GitHub で見る
 (11 comments) (3 reactions) (0 assignees)Scala (1,159 forks)batch import
area:match-typeshelp wanteditype:enhancement

Repository metrics

Stars
 (6,247 stars)
PR merge metrics
 (平均マージ 18d 14h) (30d で 133 merged PRs)

説明

Minimized code

trait RDF {
  type Triple
}
object RDF {
  type Triple[R <: RDF] = R match {
    case (RDF { type Triple = t }) => t
  }
  type GetTriple[T] = RDF { type Triple = T }
}

Output

Not found: type t

Expectation

Expected to be able to extract a variable type from inside a type refinement.

This syntax limit can be worked around by introducing a "pattern type":

trait RDF {
  type Triple
}
object RDF {
  type Triple[R <: RDF] = R match {
    case GetTriple[t] => t
  }
  type GetTriple[T] = RDF { type Triple = T }
}

Why write something like that? Apparently this pattern of extracting a field using a match type can substitute for some usages of generalized type projections and is enough to port some of the libraries using type projections, e.g. https://github.com/bblfish/banana-play

コントリビューターガイド