rjsf-team/react-jsonschema-form

Could ajv be *optionally* swapped with `@cfworker/json-schema`?

Open

#3,269 opened on 2022年12月2日

GitHub で見る
 (15 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)TypeScript (13,175 stars) (2,136 forks)batch import
featurehelp wanted

説明

Prerequisites

What theme are you using?

bootstrap-4

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The issue is that I can't use RJSF in a context that disallows unsafe-eval, as described a few times before.

Describe the solution you'd like

Could RJSF offer validation based on @cfworker/json-schema, for example? I noticed that was made in the v5 branch towards this goal:

This could be offered as an alternative to the built-in ajv-based validation

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

コントリビューターガイド

技術スタック
typescriptreactjavascript
領域
frontend
Issue 種別
feature
難度新しい貢献者にとっての実装難度です。1 は非常に小さな変更、5 は専門的な作業です。
3
推定時間経験ある貢献者が調査、実装、テスト、pull request 準備にかけるおおよその時間範囲です。
3-5 days
活動状況Issue が今どれだけ取り組みやすいかを示します。新しい、活発、古い、ブロック中、またはメンテナー入力待ちなどです。
needs maintainer response
明確さ期待される変更、受け入れ条件、次の手順がどれだけ明確かを示します。
clear
前提条件
ReactJSON SchemaTypeScriptajv
初心者向け度初回貢献者にどれだけ取り組みやすいかを 1-100 で推定したスコアです。
40
調査方針
Examine the existing validation setup in the v5 branch (issue #2693) and understand how @cfworker/json schema was integrated. Review the current ajv integration in the main branch (likely in src/validators) to identify key files. Investigate the differences between ajv and @cfworker/json schema APIs to design a seamless optional swap. Also, check the comments on this issue for any design suggestions or maintainer feedback.