New rule: identify missing PropType definition · jsx-eslint/eslint-plugin-react#1887

(9 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)JavaScript (8,630 stars) (2,797 forks)batch import

help wantednew rule

説明

I accidentally forgot to add the PropTypes assignment to a prop and this was not picked up by eslint:

const propTypes = {
    actions: {
        something: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
    }.isRequired,
};

should have been

const propTypes = {
    actions: PropTypes.shape({
        something: PropTypes.func.isRequired,
    }).isRequired,
};

技術スタック: javascriptreact
領域: toolingdeveloper experience
Issue 種別: feature
難度: 3
推定時間: 1-2 days
活動状況: stale
明確さ: clear
前提条件: ESLint plugin developmentAST parsingReact
初心者向け度: 40
調査方針: The issue requests a new ESLint rule to detect missing PropTypes.shape wrapper around nested prop definitions. The example shows a case where an object literal is directly assigned as a value to a prop instead of wrapping it with PropTypes.shape. To implement this, study the existing rules in the eslint plugin react repository, particularly those related to PropTypes validation. The new rule should parse the AST to identify PropTypes assignments and verify that nested objects are wrapped with PropTypes.shape. It should also include proper test cases and documentation.