google/flatbuffers

Bazel rule rewrite

Open

#8,941 opened on 2026年2月26日

GitHub で見る
 (2 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)C++ (25,952 stars) (3,564 forks)batch import
CIhelp wanted

説明

For my use case the existing flatbuffers_cc_library isn't sufficient. For example, it can't accept filegroups as source arguments. I think the best way to handle this would be to write new idiomatic Bazel rules from scratch using providers, custom rules instead of genrules, etc. To start, it would probably make sense to implement these rules in parallel to the existing rules to give people time to migrate.

I'm willing to implement this--would such a PR be accepted or would I be better off creating a separate rules_flatbuffers project? Thanks for any advice!

コントリビューターガイド

技術スタック
cpp
領域
build system
Issue 種別
feature
難度新しい貢献者にとっての実装難度です。1 は非常に小さな変更、5 は専門的な作業です。
5
推定時間経験ある貢献者が調査、実装、テスト、pull request 準備にかけるおおよその時間範囲です。
over 1 week
活動状況Issue が今どれだけ取り組みやすいかを示します。新しい、活発、古い、ブロック中、またはメンテナー入力待ちなどです。
needs maintainer response
明確さ期待される変更、受け入れ条件、次の手順がどれだけ明確かを示します。
mostly clear
前提条件
BazelC++flatbuffers internals
初心者向け度初回貢献者にどれだけ取り組みやすいかを 1-100 で推定したスコアです。
10
調査方針
The issue proposes rewriting Bazel rules for flatbuffers using providers and custom rules to support filegroups as input. The author is willing to implement but awaits maintainer approval on whether to integrate into the main repository or create a separate rules flatbuffers project. Newcomers should monitor the discussion for maintainer response and clarification of acceptance criteria. The existing `flatbuffers cc library` rule file is a key reference.