Recursive include of the input file in the output folder · arxiv-vanity/engrafo#182

(5 comments) (0 reactions) (0 assignees)HTML (990 stars) (96 forks)batch import

good first issuehelp wantedtype/bug

説明

Hi, I tried engrafo locally (using docker), with

sudo docker run -v "$(pwd)":/workdir -w /workdir arxivvanity/engrafo engrafo -o ./output/ ./input/test.tex

and somehow the content of the ./input/ folder gets copied in ./output/, which also contains a ./output folder with the tex files and all the figures, and recursively (for quite a deep recursive include, for example output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output /output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/output/input.bib is here... (see attached file for the listing, du.log)

Any idea to solve this bug?

Generating a simple output from a 5-page article took 556 Mo on my disk. Just crazy...

コントリビューターガイド

技術スタック: pythondockershell
領域: clitooling
Issue 種別: bug
難度: 3
推定時間: 1-3 hours
活動状況: stale
明確さ: mostly clear
前提条件: Docker basicsLaTeX basics
初心者向け度: 40
調査方針: Investigate the Docker volume mount and the engrafo output handling code. The issue suggests that the input folder content is recursively copied into the output folder. Check if the tool's o option or the Docker volume mount causes the input directory to be included in the output. Look at the engrafo script (likely a Python script) and the Dockerfile for how the output directory is treated. Also examine the file copying logic in the tool's source code to prevent recursive inclusion.