Effort: ModerateExperimentation NeededHelp WantedRevisitSuggestion
Repository metrics
- Stars
- (48,455 stars)
- PR merge metrics
- (平均マージ 6d 17h) (30d で 9 merged PRs)
説明
Type queries combined with indexed access types currently produce a parse tree that is surprising in its behavior.
One would think that typeof Foo['bar'] would be parsed as typeof (Foo['bar']), which would really be something like typeof Foo.bar.
That's not the case. It's actually parsed as (typeof Foo)['bar'].
Conveniently, it seems that semantically (when type-checking) these are identical, but it seems strange for syntactic consumers. Do we believe this is currently working as intended?