rust-lang/rust-analyzer

Benchmark with different allocators

Open

#1441 aperta il 26 giu 2019

Vedi su GitHub
 (8 commenti) (2 reazioni) (0 assegnatari)Rust (1726 fork)batch import
E-hardfungood first issue

Metriche repository

Star
 (14.924 star)
Metriche merge PR
 (Merge medio 3g 11h) (113 PR mergiate in 30 g)

Descrizione

The recent paper about https://github.com/microsoft/mimalloc sounds too good to be true.

It might be a good idea to compare different allocators to see if there are some memory usage wins to have. Better perf would also be helpful, but memory usage is the most important thing

Here's the couple of benchmarks that should be representative (you can use any other large project instead of chalk, for example, rust-analyzer itself):

cargo run --package ra_cli --release -- analysis-bench ../chalk/ --complete ../chalk/chalk-engine/src/logic.rs:94:0
cargo run --package ra_cli --release -- analysis-stats ../chalk

I think /usr/bin/time could be used to compare both time and memory (rss)?

We need to compare at least:

  • jemalloc
  • mimalloc
  • system allocator (bonus points if you check with different OSes)

Guida contributor