recommenders-team/recommenders

Which unsupervised method can infer explicit interaction from occurance(count) data?

Open

#1384 aperta il 24 apr 2021

Vedi su GitHub
 (0 commenti) (0 reazioni) (0 assegnatari)Python (2972 fork)batch import
help wanted

Metriche repository

Star
 (17.706 star)
Metriche merge PR
 (Merge medio 6g 16h) (10 PR mergiate in 30 g)

Descrizione

Our input data is a table of edges (edge weight is implicit interaction, which weighted with co-occurrence, edge type was also implicit which inferred from prior knowledge) and a list of nodes (two types: users and items). Group-truth is a small set of edges that are known to exist. The ground-truth set is too small to train a model, therefore, we want to do unsupervised analysis. For example:

edgetable.csv (potential edges) dst | src | attr A | B | edgetype1 A | B | edgetype2 A | C | edgetype1 B | D | edgetype1

nodetable nodeID | type | sample1(count) | sample2(count) | sample3(count) A | nodetype2 | 5 | 6 | 8 B | nodetype1 | 3 | 5 | 9 C | nodetype1 | 2 | 4 | 6 D | nodetype2 | 5 | 2 | 5

ground-truth B D edgetype1

Our purpose is twofold:

Whether there is an explicit interaction between two types of nodes turely exist in given samples?
How to determine the edge type?

Thank you for your help!

Guida contributor