llvm/llvm-project
Vedi su GitHubDecomposition Declaration diagnostic for missing initializer is pretty unclear
Open
#90.107 aperta il 25 apr 2024
clang:diagnosticsgood first issuequality-of-implementation
Metriche repository
- Star
- (26.378 star)
- Metriche merge PR
- (Merge medio 1g 2h) (1000 PR mergiate in 30 g)
Descrizione
Given the following code:
#include <utility>
std::pair<int, double> MyFunc();
void foo() {
auto [A, B] C = MyFunc();
}
Our diagnostic is just:
<source>:9:10: error: decomposition declaration '[A, B]' requires an initializer
9 | auto [A, B] C = MyFunc();
| ^
<source>:9:16: error: expected ';' at end of declaration
9 | auto [A, B] C = MyFunc();
| ^
| ;
2 errors generated.
Compiler returned: 1
https://godbolt.org/z/h9zKT5zGe
No compilers are particularly good at this diagnostic, but all the others at least highlight the C as the mistake, whereas Clang's error is pretty opaque/points at the opening bracket.
I'd prefer we move the 'arrow' to the position where the initializer is expected. Additionally, some improved diagnostic wording that highlights what went wrong better would be appreciated.