huggingface/peft

Comparison of Different Fine-Tuning Techniques for Conversational AI

Open

#2310 aperta il 7 gen 2025

Vedi su GitHub
 (76 commenti) (0 reazioni) (0 assegnatari)Python (1051 fork)batch import
contributions-welcomegood first issuehelp wanted

Metriche repository

Star
 (12.235 star)
Metriche merge PR
 (Merge medio 12g 10h) (42 PR mergiate in 30 g)

Descrizione

Feature request

It would be incredibly helpful to have a clear comparison or support for various fine-tuning techniques specifically for conversational AI. This feature could include insights into their strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases, helping practitioners choose the right approach for their needs.

Here’s a list of techniques to consider:

LoRa AdaLoRa BONE VeRa XLora LN Tuning VbLora HRA (Hyperparameter Regularization Adapter) IA3 (Input-Aware Adapter) Llama Adapter CPT (Conditional Prompt Tuning)etc

Motivation

With the growing number of fine-tuning techniques for conversational AI, it can be challenging to identify the most suitable approach for specific use cases. A comprehensive comparison of these techniques—highlighting their strengths, limitations, and ideal scenarios—would save time, reduce trial-and-error, and empower users to make informed decisions. This feature would bridge the gap between research and practical application, enabling more effective model customization and deployment.

Your contribution

I’d be happy to collaborate on this! While I might not have a complete solution right now, I’m willing to contribute by gathering resources, reviewing papers, or helping organize comparisons. If others are interested in teaming up, we could work together on a PR to make this feature happen. Let’s connect and brainstorm how we can tackle this effectively!

Guida contributor