GoogleChromeLabs/worker-plugin

worker_threads compatibility?

Open

Aperta il 9 ott 2018

Vedi su GitHub
 (12 commenti) (3 reazioni) (0 assegnatari)JavaScript (1908 star) (88 fork)batch import
enhancementhelp wanted

Descrizione

Understood if this is off-topic, and feel free to close, but I was just wondering if you'd considered compatibility with Node.js worker_threads here at all?

It seems like the sort of thing that would be generally useful for Node.js optimization as well, in having some kind of --node output, since you're already in the game of worker builds.

Although perhaps, a translation layer from web-style workers to Node.js-style worker_threads would be the better route as its own project.

Otherwise do you know anyone working on this problem / who considers this important?

Guida contributor

Tech stack
javascript
Dominio
backendperformance
Tipo issue
feature
DifficoltàQuanto dovrebbe essere impegnativa per un nuovo contributor.
3
Tempo stimatoTempo stimato per completare e verificare uno scope piccolo.
half day
Stato attivitàQuanto è probabile che la issue sia ancora attiva e reviewable.
stale
ChiarezzaQuanto chiaramente la issue descrive problema, scope e risultato atteso.
needs investigation
Prerequisiti
Web WorkersNode.js worker threadsWebpack plugin development
Adatta ai principiantiQuanto la issue è adatta a contributor alla prima esperienza.
30
Direzione di ricerca
Explore the existing worker plugin codebase to understand how Web Workers are bundled. Review the 12 comments in the issue for any suggested approaches or concerns. Investigate if there is a way to map Web Worker APIs to Node.js worker threads, possibly by creating a translation layer. Check if any external projects or proposals exist for this compatibility. Consider the maintainer's view on whether this aligns with the project's scope.