greenelab/deep-review

Refresh Metagenomics section

Open

#847 opened on Mar 22, 2018

View on GitHub
 (0 comments) (1 reaction) (0 assignees)HTML (1,231 stars) (277 forks)batch import
help wantedstudy

Description

During proofreading, the Metagenomics section jumped out as one that could use a refresh to better fit the style of the others. It was hard to decipher where were are citing papers that provide context about the field versus papers that show how deep learning is affecting the field.

Contributor guide

Tech stack
None
Domain
documentation
Issue type
documentation
DifficultyEstimated implementation difficulty for a new contributor, from 1 for very small changes to 5 for expert-level work.
3
Estimated timeA rough time range for an experienced contributor to investigate, implement, test, and prepare a pull request.
1-2 days
Activity statusHow available the issue appears right now: fresh, active, stale, blocked, or waiting on maintainer input.
stale
ClarityHow clearly the issue explains the expected change, acceptance criteria, and next step.
needs investigation
Prerequisites
understanding of metagenomicsfamiliarity with deep learning literature
Newbie friendlinessA 1-100 score estimating how approachable this issue is for first-time contributors.
30
Research direction
Examine the current Metagenomics section and compare its style to other sections in the deep review repository. Identify which citations provide context versus those showing deep learning impact. Look at the structure and language used in well polished sections to guide a rewrite. Consider discussing with maintainers to clarify the intended focus and scope of the section.