Inconsistency between indent level in AOSP and non-aosp
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
Research direction
Reproduce the report with the Test.java example and run google-java-format both with and without --aosp. Compare the continuation-string indentation with the expected AOSP output, then inspect the formatter behavior responsible for that difference. Done means the AOSP result is clarified or corrected and covered by an appropriate regression test.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
I am not entirely sure wether this is the intended behavior, so here is an issue. The the continuation of the long string doesn't indent with 8 spaces from the previous line which I would expect in AOSP.
Test.java
public class Test {
String s = "asdfasdfasdfasdf asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdffasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasd";
}
❯ java -jar ~/Downloads/google-java-format-1.24.0-all-deps.jar Test.java
public class Test {
String s =
"asdfasdfasdfasdf"
+ " asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdffasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasd";
}
❯ java -jar ~/Downloads/google-java-format-1.24.0-all-deps.jar --aosp Test.java
public class Test {
String s =
"asdfasdfasdfasdf"
+ " asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdffasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasd";
}
I would expect the following output using AOSP style
public class Test {
String s =
"asdfasdfasdfasdf"
+ " asdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdffasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasdfasd";
}
I raised this issue in the spotless repo because I figured that spotless not indenting the same way as GJF would be a spotless bug.
If this is the intended behavior, please let me know, so that I can reraise the issue at spotless.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 6.2k
- Forks
- 936
- Avg merge
- 6m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Getting set up
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from google/google-java-format
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
google/google-java-format#1094 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 5/5 Over a week Newbie friendliness 15/100
google/google-java-format#1450 · 1 reaction ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
google/google-java-format#1439 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 62/100
google/google-java-format#1436 · 2 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 48/100
google/google-java-format#1428 · 4 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
All issues in google/google-java-format
Similar issues
-
bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
ci-failure-cause test-failure
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
nextcloud/notes-android#3367 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
MuntashirAkon/AppManager#2058 ·
-
SarifLogger: artifactLocation.uri is not properly encoded for file names containing '#', '?', or '%' Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
checkstyle/checkstyle#21721 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day