Hacktoberfest 2026: the issues maintainers tagged for October, open and beginner-friendly. Browse Hacktoberfest issues

init writes branch.<name>.remote = '.', so submit reports a push that never happened

Open
#480 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
48/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Active
Tech stack
git, github, go
Domain
cli, devtools

Research direction

Reproduce the worktree scenario with gh stack init --base develop feature/a feature/b, inspect the resulting branch.*.remote values with git config, then run gh stack submit --auto and compare with git ls-remote --heads origin. Done means init does not create an unusable . remote and submit does not report success unless the branches actually reach the configured remote.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Environment

  • gh 2.96.0 (2026-07-02), gh-stack v0.0.4, git 2.46.1, macOS 26.6
  • Run inside a git worktree (GIT_DIR=.git/worktrees/<name>)
  • origin is the canonical repo name, not a rename

Summary

gh stack init wrote branch.<name>.remote = . into git config. . means this local repository, so the subsequent gh stack submit pushed nowhere, printed Pushing to ...., and still reported ✓ Pushed and synced 2 branches. The branches did not exist on origin.

This is the same failure as #461 and the same family as #472, but a different trigger. There the cause was a renamed repo; here it is the remote config that init itself wrote.

Repro

git worktree add ../wt -b feature/a
# ... commit on feature/a, then branch feature/b on top, commit
gh stack init --base develop feature/a feature/b
git config --get-regexp 'branch\.feature.*remote'

Observed:

branch.feature/a.remote .
branch.feature/b.remote .

Every other branch in the same repo that was not created by gh stack init has remote origin.

Then:

gh stack submit --auto
Checking stack state...
Pushing to ....
⚠ failed to create PR for feature/a: creating PR: GraphQL: Head sha can't be blank,
  Base sha can't be blank, No commits between develop and feature/a,
  Head ref must be a branch (createPullRequest)
✓ Pushed and synced 2 branches

git ls-remote --heads origin 'feature/*' returns nothing. The push never happened, but the last line says it did. The PR-creation error is a downstream symptom: GitHub cannot see a branch that was never pushed.

Workaround

git push origin feature/a feature/b
git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/feature/a feature/a
git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/feature/b feature/b

After that, gh stack submit prints Pushing to origin... and works correctly. The stack view and the GitHub-side stack were unaffected throughout.

Why it matters

The empty remote name renders as Pushing to ...., which reads as ordinary progress ellipsis rather than an empty value, so there is nothing on screen to notice. Combined with the unconditional ✓ Pushed and synced line, the command looks like it succeeded. I only caught it because PR creation happened to fail in the same run; on a stack where the PRs already exist, submit would report success and silently push nothing.

Given #461 and #472 report the same shape from different causes, the general fix may be for submit to verify the push landed rather than trusting it, and to refuse an empty or . remote outright.

Note

I have not isolated whether the worktree is required to reproduce. It may be related to #459, which reports that gh-stack ties local state to $GIT_DIR and that a worktree changes it.

Dominant language
Go
Stars
1.5k
Forks
73
Avg merge
1d 8h
Merged PRs (30d)
7

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from github/gh-stack

All issues in github/gh-stack

Similar issues

More Go issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.