Responses API should support native `previous_response_id` chaining

Open
#2,184 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
35/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Active

Research direction

Start by tracing the Responses API request path and the SDK's PreviousResponseId protocol field, then compare tool continuations, later user turns, and resumed sessions. Done means supported providers use retained response IDs with incremental input, preserve required settings, fall back to full history when chaining fails, and keep context and tool behavior correct.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

enhancement
Summary

When using the Copilot SDK/CLI with the Responses API, every model round reconstructs and sends the complete conversation history. The runtime does not send previous_response_id and sets store: false.

This substantially increases request tokens for long-running and resumed sessions.

Versions tested
  • GitHub.Copilot.SDK 1.0.5 with Copilot CLI 1.0.73
  • GitHub.Copilot.SDK 1.0.9-preview.1 with Copilot CLI 1.0.74
  • Azure AI Foundry OpenAI-compatible provider
  • wireApi: responses

The preview SDK references CLI 1.0.76-5, but that package was not available for testing.

Observed behavior

A privacy-safe request probe showed:

  • Initial request: 1 input item
  • Tool continuation: 3 input items
  • Next user turn: 5 input items
  • Resumed session in a new process: 7 input items

No request included previous_response_id. The runtime also emitted store: false.

In a real long-running session, this resulted in approximately 26K–28K reported input tokens per request, including tool continuations.

Expected behavior

After the initial Responses request:

  1. Set store: true, or otherwise use provider-supported response retention.
  2. Capture the terminal response ID.
  3. Send subsequent model rounds with:
    • previous_response_id
    • only newly added input items
  4. Preserve instructions, tools, and request settings as required by the Responses API.
  5. Fall back to full history if the provider rejects or cannot resolve the response ID.

This should apply to both tool-result continuations and subsequent user turns.

Workaround validation

We implemented an experimental request handler that:

  • changes store: false to store: true,
  • captures IDs from terminal SSE response events,
  • adds previous_response_id,
  • replaces reconstructed history with incremental input,
  • falls back to full history when chaining cannot be verified.

Live validation reduced:

  • a tool continuation from 60 input items to 1,
  • a subsequent user turn from 66 input items to 1.

Conversation context and tool behavior remained correct.

The handler also had to account for non-semantic differences when the CLI reconstructed response items:

  • regenerated top-level response item id,
  • omitted assistant-message phase,
  • omitted output-text logprobs.

Semantic content and tool call_id values were still compared exactly.

Request

Could native Responses API chaining be added to the Copilot CLI/runtime and exposed or enabled through the SDK?

It would also be useful to clarify:

  • whether the SDK’s PreviousResponseId protocol field is currently used by any provider path,
  • how response IDs should persist across SDK session resumes or process restarts,
  • whether token telemetry can report the actual rewritten wire input rather than reconstructed local history.
Dominant language
Java
Stars
10.5k
Forks
1.5k
Avg merge
1d 12h
Merged PRs (30d)
133

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from github/copilot-sdk

All issues in github/copilot-sdk

Similar issues

More Java issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.